0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I haven't actually played this map, but 26/40 seems like a ridiculously high score? At least with what you're saying throughout the review.All of the features (guns, PaP textures, etc.) are just default UGX mod features, and they're not even from the latest edition of the mod. And the mapper apparently couldn't be assed to fix the shitty viewhands that make the PC look like a 90-y/o woman with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.If you haven't played UGX 1.0, then I can understand how the map might be pleasing to you, but for everyone who's already played the mod there's barely any incentive to go and play a map that looks ugly and has no real selling points besides the mod -- especially when there are better examples of maps that use it.For the record I do think that this was actually a good, even-handed review, but it seems to me like you went "soft" (or maybe even flaccid) on the mapper because you think he has potential. Don't. Do the opposite: I would be disappointed as hell if someone I thought had potential shat out a boxy map in 15 hr. with UGX as its only real feature. You can only help someone improve by providing criticism when it's necessary, and at times like this, it IS necessary to be harsh.
wait are u saying the guns were a pro cause that was the old ugx mod in use there
And the mapper apparently couldn't be assed to fix the shitty viewhands that make the PC look like a 90-y/o woman with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
I'm sorry but I just find this hilarious XDGood review ShotgunRagtime! Although I would maybe have said a 21/40 because let's face it, it's just the regular UGX mod that was just slapped onto the map like many others so it's nothing new or special.
Aye mate you don't know me so y don't you shut tf up ok buddy
Maybe that's his, ahem, style, you know what I mean?
Huh? Xperience wrote the review.